• United States v. Microsoft: Deposition by Bill Gates, part 1.

    United States v. Microsoft was a court case filed against Microsoft by the United States Department of Justice. The plaintiffs alleged that Microsoft abused monopoly power in its handling of operating system sales and web browser sales. The issue central to the case was whether Microsoft was allowed to bundle its flagship Internet Explorer (IE) web browser software with its Windows operating system. Microsoft stated that the merging of Windows and Internet Explorer was the result of innovation and competition, and that the two were now the same product and were inextricably linked together and that consumers were now getting all the benefits of IE for free.

    published: 03 May 2012
  • Structure of the Court System: Crash Course Government and Politics #19

    This week Craig Benzine is going to talk about the structure of the U.S. court system and how exactly it manages to keep things moving smoothly. We''ll talk about trial courts, district...

    published: 05 Jun 2015
  • United States Body Shop Litigation (CNN Report)

    United States Body Shop Litigation (CNN Report)

    published: 17 Aug 2015
  • Litigation And Legal Practice - The American Legal System (Episode 1)

    Law School for Everyone - Litigation And Legal Practice Litigation And The American Legal System

    published: 26 Nov 2017
  • Litigation Attorney, What Constitutes Someone Being Called A United States Natural Born Citizen

    See also https://publiushuldah.wordpress.com/category/natural-born-citizen/ I use the ff. to guide Founding Fathers Intent: "To be a United States Natural Born Citizen, he (or she) must be one of sole nationality, so that were he (or she) ever stripped of citizenship in the United States, he (or she) would be declared as “Stateless. " "...the term ‘natural born citizen’ is used and excludes all persons owing allegiance by birth to foreign states.” The New Englander and Yale Law Review, Volume 3 (1845), p. 414 In 1833, in U.S. Supreme Court Justice Joseph Story's Commentaries on the Constitution of the United States. § 1473 “ It is indispensible too, that the president should be a natural born citizen of the United States... to exclude foreign influence from their executive coun...

    published: 12 Feb 2016
  • United States v.s Holy Land Foundation Litigation #JihadInAmerica

    The Holy Land Foundation was the largest Islamic charity in the United States. Headquartered in Richardson, Texas, it was originally known as Occupied Land Fund. In December 2001, the U.S. government designated HLF a terrorist organization, seized its assets, and closed the organization. In 2004, a federal grand jury in Dallas, Texas charged HLF and five former officers and employees with providing material support to Hamas and related offenses. The prosecution's theory was that HLF distributed charity through local zakat (charity) committees located in the West Bank; that Hamas controlled those zakat committees; and that by distributing charity through Hamas-controlled committees, HLF helped Hamas win the "hearts and minds" of the Palestinian people. The first trial, in 2007, ended in th...

    published: 23 Jun 2016
  • Frank Easterbrook, "The Supreme Court of the United States and Business Litigation"

    published: 20 Feb 2015
  • What is INTERNATIONAL LITIGATION? What does INTERNATIONAL LITIGATION mean?

    What is INTERNATIONAL LITIGATION? What does INTERNATIONAL LITIGATION mean? INTERNATIONAL LITIGATION meaning - INTERNATIONAL LITIGATION definition - INTERNATIONAL LITIGATION explanation. Source: Wikipedia.org article, adapted under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/ license. SUBSCRIBE to our Google Earth flights channel - https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC6UuCPh7GrXznZi0Hz2YQnQ International litigation, sometimes called transnational litigation, is the practice of litigation in connection with disputes among businesses or individuals residing or based in different countries. The main difference between international litigation and domestic litigation is that, in the former, certain issues are more likely to be of significance — such as personal jurisdiction, service of proc...

    published: 21 Aug 2017
  • What is an appeal in a civil litigation?

    What is an appeal in a civil litigation? This video introduces appellate practice, where a party that did not prevail on one or more claims in a civil litigation argues that the trial court judge committed an error. To discuss further, feel free to send me an email and to comment below. Also, please visit my new website and blog. I offer online tutoring and consultations. website: http://www.uslawessentials.squarespace.com blog: http://www.uslawessentials.squarespace.com/blog email:uslawessentials at gmail dot com Twitter:https://twitter.com/uslawessentials United States Law: An Introduction for International Students is available at: https://www.amazon.com/author/danieledelson

    published: 16 Aug 2014
  • What is PARALLEL LITIGATION? What does PARALLEL LITIGATION mean? PARALLEL LITIGATION meaning

    What is PARALLEL LITIGATION? What does PARALLEL LITIGATION mean? PARALLEL LITIGATION meaning - PARALLEL LITIGATION definition - PARALLEL LITIGATION explanation. Source: Wikipedia.org article, adapted under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/ license. Parallel litigation is a scenario in which different courts are hearing the same claim(s). The general rule is that parallel litigation (and the "race to judgment" that results) is a necessary and acceptable consequence of our system of dual sovereignty, in which both state and federal courts have personal jurisdiction over the parties. A major exception to this rule is that a second parallel In rem proceeding will be enjoined by the first court to obtain jurisdiction, as it has already been drawn into constructive possession o...

    published: 11 Jun 2017
  • Jeffrey L. Fisher | Supreme Court Litigation

    Professor Jeffrey L. Fisher - one of the most experienced and successful appellate advocates in the country - discusses his practice before the United States Supreme Court. Fisher leads Stanford's Supreme Court clinic. In an interview with Professor Lisa Kern Griffin, he addresses the cert. process and the Supreme Court's case selection, the role of oral argument, and some of his recent cases concerning marriage equality, digital privacy, and other criminal procedure issues. Sponsored by the Program in Public Law.

    published: 09 Feb 2016
  • What is Discovery: Discovery & Settlement

    What is Discovery: Discovery & Settlement. This video discusses the relationship between discovery and settlement in the United States. uslawessentials.com/blog uslawessentials.com

    published: 06 May 2014
  • Lecture 4: Patent Law & Litigation

    At the end of this video, you will be able to: - Describe the differences between U.S. and European patent laws. - Describe the history of patent litigation in the United States. -------------------------------- Take the full course on Udemy.com: http://buff.ly/2mJVjNS Michelson20mm.org Michelsonip.com *Intellectual Property: Inventors, Entrepreneurs, Creators* A FREE Intellectual Property online course by The Michelson 20MM Foundation & IPO Education Foundation. Take the course on Udemy to develop a working knowledge of the basics of patents, copyrights, trademarks, and trade secrets. Brought to you by The Michelson 20MM Foundation & IPO Education Foundation, made possible by the generous support of Alya and Gary Michelson, M.D. -------------------------------- If you have question...

    published: 01 Mar 2017
  • United States of Monsanto: GMO giant is now litigation proof

    After President Obama signed the Agriculture Appropriations Bill into law on Tuesday, hundreds of thousands of people have voiced their opposition to H.R. 933. A provision in the law known as the "Monsanto Protection Act" protects the biotech industry from being sued in a court of law. The Farmer Assurance provision takes the Federal Court's right to halt the sale and use of genetically modified seed crops regardless of health risks. Jeffrey M. Smith, author of Seeds of Deception, joins us to discuss. Find RT America in your area: http://rt.com/where-to-watch/ Or watch us online: http://rt.com/on-air/rt-america-air/ Like us on Facebook http://www.facebook.com/RTAmerica Follow us on Twitter http://twitter.com/RT_America

    published: 29 Mar 2013
  • Basics of Federal Tax Litigation

    Learn the basics of federal tax litigation and the steps it takes. David Klasing breaks it all down. Need more help? Learn More: https://klasing-associates.com/tax-litigation/

    published: 22 Jan 2016
  • Session 5: Domestic Litigation of International Norms (June 12, 2013)

    International human rights norms can be, and have been, invoked in domestic litigation in a wide variety of contexts. State and federal courts in the United States have considered human rights claims - including those brought under the Alien Tort Statute - and the United States' international legal obligations on a range of issues. Panelists illustrated the ways in which international norms can be used to advance accountability for human rights abuses and strengthen arguments for protection or redress, but also identified the challenges and limitations of these strategies. Chimène Keitner, UC Hastings College of the Law Kathy Roberts, Center for Justice & Accountability Naomi Roht-Arriaza, UC Hastings College of the Law Karen Musalo, Center for Gender & Refugee Studies View or download t...

    published: 19 Jun 2013
  • The Emerging World of Third-Party Litigation Financing in the United States

    John Beisner, a partner at Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, discusses the paper "Selling Lawsuits, Buying Trouble: The Emerging World of Third-Party Litigation Financing in the United States," which was released at the 10th Annual Legal Reform Summit on October 28, 2009. This paper begins with an overview of third-party litigation financing. It next examines current third-party financing practices in the United States. It then sets forth a critique of the practice, particularly the incentives it creates to engage in frivolous and abusive litigation. In this section, the paper also presents a case study on the Commonwealth of Australia, the first jurisdiction to permit third-party litigation funding, where such funding has dramatically increased litigation and given investors pe...

    published: 11 Apr 2011
  • Elizabeth Warren - Examining EEOC’s Enforcement and Litigation Programs

    May 19, 2015. United States Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. Full Committee Hearing, Examining EEOC’s Enforcement and Litigation Programs. Witnesses: Jenny R. Yang, Chair, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P. David Lopez; General Counsel, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Arlington , VA Washington , DC

    published: 08 Jun 2015
  • Advertising and consumer fraud litigation: Part 1 | Intellectual property | United States

    S P E A K E R S Jeffrey Margulies, Partner, Norton Rose Fulbright Michelle Pardo, Partner, Norton Rose Fulbright Saul Perloff, Partner, Norton Rose Fulbright Stephanie Stroup, Senior Counsel, Norton Rose Fulbright Companies that make, market and sell consumer products are increasingly vulnerable to consumer fraud litigation. Class actions alleging deceptive advertising and unfair trade practices have become a veritable "growth industry" for enterprising plaintiff's lawyers. These cases often flow directly from government investigations and enforcement actions or private business litigation. For consumer product companies, understanding the current trends influencing consumer fraud litigation is crucial to managing this risk. Our two part webinar will discuss the key considerations and t...

    published: 07 Oct 2016
  • Advertising and consumer fraud litigation: Part 2 | Intellectual property | United States

    S P E A K E R S Jeffrey Margulies, Partner, Norton Rose Fulbright Michelle Pardo, Partner, Norton Rose Fulbright Saul Perloff, Partner, Norton Rose Fulbright Stephanie Stroup, Senior Counsel, Norton Rose Fulbright Companies that make, market and sell consumer products are increasingly vulnerable to consumer fraud litigation. Class actions alleging deceptive advertising and unfair trade practices have become a veritable "growth industry" for enterprising plaintiff's lawyers. These cases often flow directly from government investigations and enforcement actions or private business litigation. For consumer product companies, understanding the current trends influencing consumer fraud litigation is crucial to managing this risk. Our two part webinar will discuss the key considerations and t...

    published: 02 Nov 2016
  • US District Court of RI Litigation Academy HD

    The “Litigation Academy” is a program of the United States District Court for the District of Rhode Island in partnership with Roger Williams University Law School and the Rhode Island Chapter of the Federal Bar Association that was created to provide a low-cost, high-quality forum for teaching practitioners of all experience levels the skills needed to successfully litigate cases. You are welcome to watch a short video of the program that was created by Carlos Andres Toro of Steer Digital Media.

    published: 02 Sep 2016
  • Life sciences securities litigation and enforcement issues | Healthcare | United States

    S P E A K E R S Robin Adelstein, Partner, Norton Rose Fulbright Kevin Harnisch, Partner, Norton Rose Fulbright Peter Stokes, Partner, Norton Rose Fulbright P R E S E N T A T I O N - http://ow.ly/nk8m300neGR B L O G - http://www.thehealthlawpulse.com/ Pharmaceutical, medical device and biotech companies are facing increasing scrutiny from the United States (US) Securities & Exchange Commission (SEC) and Department of Justice (DOJ), and have become a target for securities class action lawyers. Last year, life sciences companies accounted for nearly one third of all US securities class actions filed. Given the increased focus on internal controls, it is more important than ever for these companies to understand the litigation and enforcement ramifications of their disclosure practices. Pl...

    published: 19 May 2016
  • Grant Thornton ERISA Litigation

    11th Circuit Oral Argument

    published: 06 Nov 2016
  • Litigation!!(Satire)

    A story about litigation in American society.

    published: 06 Jun 2011
developed with YouTube
United States v. Microsoft: Deposition by Bill Gates, part 1.

United States v. Microsoft: Deposition by Bill Gates, part 1.

  • Order:
  • Duration: 53:18
  • Updated: 03 May 2012
  • views: 129854
videos
United States v. Microsoft was a court case filed against Microsoft by the United States Department of Justice. The plaintiffs alleged that Microsoft abused monopoly power in its handling of operating system sales and web browser sales. The issue central to the case was whether Microsoft was allowed to bundle its flagship Internet Explorer (IE) web browser software with its Windows operating system. Microsoft stated that the merging of Windows and Internet Explorer was the result of innovation and competition, and that the two were now the same product and were inextricably linked together and that consumers were now getting all the benefits of IE for free.
https://wn.com/United_States_V._Microsoft_Deposition_By_Bill_Gates,_Part_1.
Structure of the Court System: Crash Course Government and Politics #19

Structure of the Court System: Crash Course Government and Politics #19

  • Order:
  • Duration: 6:59
  • Updated: 19 Feb 2018
  • views: 472867
videos
This week Craig Benzine is going to talk about the structure of the U.S. court system and how exactly it manages to keep things moving smoothly. We''ll talk about trial courts, district...
https://wn.com/Structure_Of_The_Court_System_Crash_Course_Government_And_Politics_19
United States Body Shop Litigation (CNN Report)

United States Body Shop Litigation (CNN Report)

  • Order:
  • Duration: 10:55
  • Updated: 17 Aug 2015
  • views: 29
videos https://wn.com/United_States_Body_Shop_Litigation_(Cnn_Report)
Litigation And Legal Practice - The American Legal System (Episode 1)

Litigation And Legal Practice - The American Legal System (Episode 1)

  • Order:
  • Duration: 31:46
  • Updated: 26 Nov 2017
  • views: 7
videos
Law School for Everyone - Litigation And Legal Practice Litigation And The American Legal System
https://wn.com/Litigation_And_Legal_Practice_The_American_Legal_System_(Episode_1)
Litigation Attorney, What Constitutes Someone Being Called A United States Natural Born Citizen

Litigation Attorney, What Constitutes Someone Being Called A United States Natural Born Citizen

  • Order:
  • Duration: 12:09
  • Updated: 12 Feb 2016
  • views: 60756
videos
See also https://publiushuldah.wordpress.com/category/natural-born-citizen/ I use the ff. to guide Founding Fathers Intent: "To be a United States Natural Born Citizen, he (or she) must be one of sole nationality, so that were he (or she) ever stripped of citizenship in the United States, he (or she) would be declared as “Stateless. " "...the term ‘natural born citizen’ is used and excludes all persons owing allegiance by birth to foreign states.” The New Englander and Yale Law Review, Volume 3 (1845), p. 414 In 1833, in U.S. Supreme Court Justice Joseph Story's Commentaries on the Constitution of the United States. § 1473 “ It is indispensible too, that the president should be a natural born citizen of the United States... to exclude foreign influence from their executive councils and duties." Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. (1 Cranch) 137 (1803) @174 It cannot be presumed that any clause in the Constitution is intended to be without effect....
https://wn.com/Litigation_Attorney,_What_Constitutes_Someone_Being_Called_A_United_States_Natural_Born_Citizen
United States v.s  Holy Land Foundation Litigation #JihadInAmerica

United States v.s Holy Land Foundation Litigation #JihadInAmerica

  • Order:
  • Duration: 6:06
  • Updated: 23 Jun 2016
  • views: 260
videos
The Holy Land Foundation was the largest Islamic charity in the United States. Headquartered in Richardson, Texas, it was originally known as Occupied Land Fund. In December 2001, the U.S. government designated HLF a terrorist organization, seized its assets, and closed the organization. In 2004, a federal grand jury in Dallas, Texas charged HLF and five former officers and employees with providing material support to Hamas and related offenses. The prosecution's theory was that HLF distributed charity through local zakat (charity) committees located in the West Bank; that Hamas controlled those zakat committees; and that by distributing charity through Hamas-controlled committees, HLF helped Hamas win the "hearts and minds" of the Palestinian people. The first trial, in 2007, ended in the partial acquittal of one defendant and a hung jury on all other charges. At a retrial in 2008, the jury found all defendants guilty on all counts. The 2008 trial of the charity leaders was the "largest terrorism financing prosecution in American history." In 2009, the founders of the organization were given sentences of between 15 and 65 years in prison for "funneling $12 million to Hamas." The organization's website stated: "Our mission is to find and implement practical solutions for human suffering through humanitarian programs that impact the lives of the disadvantaged, disinherited, and displaced peoples suffering from man-made and natural disasters." HLF, originally known as the Occupied Land Fund, was established in California in 1989 as a tax-exempt charity. In 1992, HLF relocated to Richardson, Texas. It had offices in California, New Jersey, and Illinois, and individual representatives scattered throughout the US, the West Bank, and Gaza. Among the founders of the Holy Land Foundation is Mousa Mohammed Abu Marzook, a political leader of Hamas, who provided substantial funds to the Holy Land Foundation in the early 1990s, before Hamas was designated a terrorist organization. HLF reported Marzook's donations on its tax returns. Marzook was deported from the US to Jordan in 1997. He was indicted on August 20, 2004, by a US federal grand jury in Chicago, Illinois. He and two other individuals were charged with a 15-year conspiracy to raise funds for terrorist attacks against Israel. Neither HLF nor any HLF officer was charged in the Chicago indictment. In the year 2000, HLF raised over $13 million. According to the United States Department of Treasury, HLF supported Hamas activities through direct fund transfers to its offices in the West Bank and Gaza that are affiliated with Hamas, and transfers of funds to Islamic charity committees ("zakat committees") and other charitable organizations that are part of Hamas or controlled by Hamas members. The Department of Treasury also reported that HLF funds were used by Hamas to support schools that served Hamas's ends by encouraging children to become suicide bombers and to recruit suicide bombers by offering support to their families. Edward Abington, Jr., former U.S. consul general in Jerusalem, acted as a defense witness and testified that during his daily CIA briefings he had never been informed that Hamas controlled the Palestinian charity groups mentioned. The Treasury Department designated HLF as a terrorist organization on December 4, 2001 under President Bush's Executive Order 13224 (Bush). The United States Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Asset Control designated HLF as a Specially Designated Global Terrorist, while the European Union froze its European Assets. -~-~~-~~~-~~-~- Please watch: "EXPOSING: Roman Curia (Catholic Church) And Global Pedophila Networks" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mxGgRSRDuRM -~-~~-~~~-~~-~-
https://wn.com/United_States_V.S_Holy_Land_Foundation_Litigation_Jihadinamerica
Frank Easterbrook, "The Supreme Court of the United States and Business Litigation"

Frank Easterbrook, "The Supreme Court of the United States and Business Litigation"

  • Order:
  • Duration: 45:57
  • Updated: 20 Feb 2015
  • views: 684
videos
https://wn.com/Frank_Easterbrook,_The_Supreme_Court_Of_The_United_States_And_Business_Litigation
What is INTERNATIONAL LITIGATION? What does INTERNATIONAL LITIGATION mean?

What is INTERNATIONAL LITIGATION? What does INTERNATIONAL LITIGATION mean?

  • Order:
  • Duration: 7:40
  • Updated: 21 Aug 2017
  • views: 67
videos
What is INTERNATIONAL LITIGATION? What does INTERNATIONAL LITIGATION mean? INTERNATIONAL LITIGATION meaning - INTERNATIONAL LITIGATION definition - INTERNATIONAL LITIGATION explanation. Source: Wikipedia.org article, adapted under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/ license. SUBSCRIBE to our Google Earth flights channel - https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC6UuCPh7GrXznZi0Hz2YQnQ International litigation, sometimes called transnational litigation, is the practice of litigation in connection with disputes among businesses or individuals residing or based in different countries. The main difference between international litigation and domestic litigation is that, in the former, certain issues are more likely to be of significance — such as personal jurisdiction, service of process, evidence from abroad, and enforcement of judgments. Although there are differences among the jurisdictional statutes of many American states, they all are subject to the due process requirements imposed by the Constitution of the United States. As a result, most American lawyers who are familiar with general principles of jurisdiction in one or more states of the US are able to guide their clients through jurisdictional issues in connection with disputes among litigants from different states. The situation is different with respect to jurisdictional principles in the international context. The first difference concerns long-arm jurisdiction, which is the statutory grant of jurisdiction to local courts over out-of-state defendants. A long-arm statute authorizes a court in a state to exercise jurisdiction over an out-of-state defendant. Without a long-arm statute, the courts in a state might not have personal jurisdiction over an out-of-state defendant. A state's authorization to exercise jurisdiction is limited by the federal Constitution. The use of a long-arm statute is usually considered constitutional where the defendant has certain minimum contacts with the forum state and there has been reasonable notice of the action against that defendant. Second, many countries take the view that American concepts of long-arm jurisdiction are too broad, and courts of such countries will not recognize judgments from American courts based on the exercise of American long-arm jurisdiction. Looking at the issue from the non-American perspective, courts in some countries exercise jurisdiction based upon principles that American courts would consider unfair and repugnant to American law. For example, in some countries, such as England and Israel, a court may exercise jurisdiction over a defendant that is considered to be a "necessary or proper" party in a case against a local defendant. It is not clear that such a jurisdictional basis would be upheld by American courts when the non-US judgment-creditor seeks to enforce in the United States. In every lawsuit, the plaintiff must effect service of process upon the defendant(s). In the international context, the issue of service of process is more complex. In the United States, service of process is routinely carried out by private lawyers or their agents. In contrast, many other countries consider the activity of serving process in a judicial proceeding to be one appropriate only for the government or an arm of the government. As a result of differing approaches to the issue of service of process, several nations signed the Hague Service Convention (1965), under which each member nation is required to establish a Central Authority to receive, review, and execute requests from foreign courts for carrying out service of process. Most countries that are signatories to the Hague Service Convention will accept requests for service that are signed by the lawyer for the plaintiff (claimant). Two exceptions are the UK and Israel. .....
https://wn.com/What_Is_International_Litigation_What_Does_International_Litigation_Mean
What is an appeal in a civil litigation?

What is an appeal in a civil litigation?

  • Order:
  • Duration: 2:15
  • Updated: 16 Aug 2014
  • views: 4675
videos
What is an appeal in a civil litigation? This video introduces appellate practice, where a party that did not prevail on one or more claims in a civil litigation argues that the trial court judge committed an error. To discuss further, feel free to send me an email and to comment below. Also, please visit my new website and blog. I offer online tutoring and consultations. website: http://www.uslawessentials.squarespace.com blog: http://www.uslawessentials.squarespace.com/blog email:uslawessentials at gmail dot com Twitter:https://twitter.com/uslawessentials United States Law: An Introduction for International Students is available at: https://www.amazon.com/author/danieledelson
https://wn.com/What_Is_An_Appeal_In_A_Civil_Litigation
What is PARALLEL LITIGATION? What does PARALLEL LITIGATION mean? PARALLEL LITIGATION meaning

What is PARALLEL LITIGATION? What does PARALLEL LITIGATION mean? PARALLEL LITIGATION meaning

  • Order:
  • Duration: 2:07
  • Updated: 11 Jun 2017
  • views: 25
videos
What is PARALLEL LITIGATION? What does PARALLEL LITIGATION mean? PARALLEL LITIGATION meaning - PARALLEL LITIGATION definition - PARALLEL LITIGATION explanation. Source: Wikipedia.org article, adapted under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/ license. Parallel litigation is a scenario in which different courts are hearing the same claim(s). The general rule is that parallel litigation (and the "race to judgment" that results) is a necessary and acceptable consequence of our system of dual sovereignty, in which both state and federal courts have personal jurisdiction over the parties. A major exception to this rule is that a second parallel In rem proceeding will be enjoined by the first court to obtain jurisdiction, as it has already been drawn into constructive possession of the object of the dispute. In rare cases the federal courts have announced a policy of not hearing (abstaining from) a case when there is parallel litigation going on in state courts, following the Colorado River abstention doctrine. In that case, the federal government sued for adjudication of certain water rights in Colorado; parties to a state court proceeding joined the U.S. as a defendant, and the Supreme Court said the federal courts should defer to that parallel litigation. This analysis can be conceptualized as a Forum non conveniens analysis in which there is already an alternative forum in play. The general rule is that "bstention from the exercise of federal jurisdiction is the exception, not the rule." Cone Mem. Hosp. v. Mercury Constr. Corp., 460 U.S. 1, 14 (1983) (citing Colo. River Water Conserv. Distr. v. United States, 424 U.S. 800, 813 (1976)).
https://wn.com/What_Is_Parallel_Litigation_What_Does_Parallel_Litigation_Mean_Parallel_Litigation_Meaning
Jeffrey L. Fisher | Supreme Court Litigation

Jeffrey L. Fisher | Supreme Court Litigation

  • Order:
  • Duration: 1:13:17
  • Updated: 09 Feb 2016
  • views: 1198
videos
Professor Jeffrey L. Fisher - one of the most experienced and successful appellate advocates in the country - discusses his practice before the United States Supreme Court. Fisher leads Stanford's Supreme Court clinic. In an interview with Professor Lisa Kern Griffin, he addresses the cert. process and the Supreme Court's case selection, the role of oral argument, and some of his recent cases concerning marriage equality, digital privacy, and other criminal procedure issues. Sponsored by the Program in Public Law.
https://wn.com/Jeffrey_L._Fisher_|_Supreme_Court_Litigation
What is Discovery: Discovery & Settlement

What is Discovery: Discovery & Settlement

  • Order:
  • Duration: 4:17
  • Updated: 06 May 2014
  • views: 11315
videos
What is Discovery: Discovery & Settlement. This video discusses the relationship between discovery and settlement in the United States. uslawessentials.com/blog uslawessentials.com
https://wn.com/What_Is_Discovery_Discovery_Settlement
Lecture 4: Patent Law & Litigation

Lecture 4: Patent Law & Litigation

  • Order:
  • Duration: 6:32
  • Updated: 01 Mar 2017
  • views: 287
videos
At the end of this video, you will be able to: - Describe the differences between U.S. and European patent laws. - Describe the history of patent litigation in the United States. -------------------------------- Take the full course on Udemy.com: http://buff.ly/2mJVjNS Michelson20mm.org Michelsonip.com *Intellectual Property: Inventors, Entrepreneurs, Creators* A FREE Intellectual Property online course by The Michelson 20MM Foundation & IPO Education Foundation. Take the course on Udemy to develop a working knowledge of the basics of patents, copyrights, trademarks, and trade secrets. Brought to you by The Michelson 20MM Foundation & IPO Education Foundation, made possible by the generous support of Alya and Gary Michelson, M.D. -------------------------------- If you have questions or comments please email us at info@20mm.org
https://wn.com/Lecture_4_Patent_Law_Litigation
United States of Monsanto: GMO giant is now litigation proof

United States of Monsanto: GMO giant is now litigation proof

  • Order:
  • Duration: 7:25
  • Updated: 29 Mar 2013
  • views: 20434
videos
After President Obama signed the Agriculture Appropriations Bill into law on Tuesday, hundreds of thousands of people have voiced their opposition to H.R. 933. A provision in the law known as the "Monsanto Protection Act" protects the biotech industry from being sued in a court of law. The Farmer Assurance provision takes the Federal Court's right to halt the sale and use of genetically modified seed crops regardless of health risks. Jeffrey M. Smith, author of Seeds of Deception, joins us to discuss. Find RT America in your area: http://rt.com/where-to-watch/ Or watch us online: http://rt.com/on-air/rt-america-air/ Like us on Facebook http://www.facebook.com/RTAmerica Follow us on Twitter http://twitter.com/RT_America
https://wn.com/United_States_Of_Monsanto_Gmo_Giant_Is_Now_Litigation_Proof
Basics of Federal Tax Litigation

Basics of Federal Tax Litigation

  • Order:
  • Duration: 25:38
  • Updated: 22 Jan 2016
  • views: 36518
videos
Learn the basics of federal tax litigation and the steps it takes. David Klasing breaks it all down. Need more help? Learn More: https://klasing-associates.com/tax-litigation/
https://wn.com/Basics_Of_Federal_Tax_Litigation
Session 5: Domestic Litigation of International Norms (June 12, 2013)

Session 5: Domestic Litigation of International Norms (June 12, 2013)

  • Order:
  • Duration: 1:36:45
  • Updated: 19 Jun 2013
  • views: 214
videos
International human rights norms can be, and have been, invoked in domestic litigation in a wide variety of contexts. State and federal courts in the United States have considered human rights claims - including those brought under the Alien Tort Statute - and the United States' international legal obligations on a range of issues. Panelists illustrated the ways in which international norms can be used to advance accountability for human rights abuses and strengthen arguments for protection or redress, but also identified the challenges and limitations of these strategies. Chimène Keitner, UC Hastings College of the Law Kathy Roberts, Center for Justice & Accountability Naomi Roht-Arriaza, UC Hastings College of the Law Karen Musalo, Center for Gender & Refugee Studies View or download the agenda, speaker bios, speaker presentations, and all the background informational materials here: bit.ly/humanrightsframework
https://wn.com/Session_5_Domestic_Litigation_Of_International_Norms_(June_12,_2013)
The Emerging World of Third-Party Litigation Financing in the United States

The Emerging World of Third-Party Litigation Financing in the United States

  • Order:
  • Duration: 2:06
  • Updated: 11 Apr 2011
  • views: 760
videos
John Beisner, a partner at Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, discusses the paper "Selling Lawsuits, Buying Trouble: The Emerging World of Third-Party Litigation Financing in the United States," which was released at the 10th Annual Legal Reform Summit on October 28, 2009. This paper begins with an overview of third-party litigation financing. It next examines current third-party financing practices in the United States. It then sets forth a critique of the practice, particularly the incentives it creates to engage in frivolous and abusive litigation. In this section, the paper also presents a case study on the Commonwealth of Australia, the first jurisdiction to permit third-party litigation funding, where such funding has dramatically increased litigation and given investors pervasive — even total — control over a plaintiff's litigation. Finally, the paper proposes that third-party litigation financing be prohibited in the United States to prevent these abuses. At the very least, the paper concludes, such funding should be banned in class actions and other forms of aggregate litigation. The paper can be found online here: http://www.instituteforlegalreform.com/selling-lawsuits-buying-trouble-the-emerging-world-of-third-party-litigation-financing-in-the-united-states.html
https://wn.com/The_Emerging_World_Of_Third_Party_Litigation_Financing_In_The_United_States
Elizabeth Warren - Examining EEOC’s Enforcement and Litigation Programs

Elizabeth Warren - Examining EEOC’s Enforcement and Litigation Programs

  • Order:
  • Duration: 6:06
  • Updated: 08 Jun 2015
  • views: 522
videos
May 19, 2015. United States Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. Full Committee Hearing, Examining EEOC’s Enforcement and Litigation Programs. Witnesses: Jenny R. Yang, Chair, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P. David Lopez; General Counsel, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Arlington , VA Washington , DC
https://wn.com/Elizabeth_Warren_Examining_Eeoc’S_Enforcement_And_Litigation_Programs
Advertising and consumer fraud litigation: Part 1 | Intellectual property | United States

Advertising and consumer fraud litigation: Part 1 | Intellectual property | United States

  • Order:
  • Duration: 57:38
  • Updated: 07 Oct 2016
  • views: 76
videos
S P E A K E R S Jeffrey Margulies, Partner, Norton Rose Fulbright Michelle Pardo, Partner, Norton Rose Fulbright Saul Perloff, Partner, Norton Rose Fulbright Stephanie Stroup, Senior Counsel, Norton Rose Fulbright Companies that make, market and sell consumer products are increasingly vulnerable to consumer fraud litigation. Class actions alleging deceptive advertising and unfair trade practices have become a veritable "growth industry" for enterprising plaintiff's lawyers. These cases often flow directly from government investigations and enforcement actions or private business litigation. For consumer product companies, understanding the current trends influencing consumer fraud litigation is crucial to managing this risk. Our two part webinar will discuss the key considerations and trends impacting consumer fraud litigation today, including government and Lanham Act litigation, recent legal decisions, as well as class action litigation and trial strategies. Topics included: - Government litigation priorities and Lanham litigation and recent trends in consumer class actions S E L F - S T U D Y If you are viewing a recording of this web seminar, most state bar organizations will only allow you to claim self-study CLE credit. Please refer to your state's CLE rules. If you have any questions regarding CLE approval of this course in your applicable bar, please contact your bar administrator.
https://wn.com/Advertising_And_Consumer_Fraud_Litigation_Part_1_|_Intellectual_Property_|_United_States
Advertising and consumer fraud litigation: Part 2 | Intellectual property | United States

Advertising and consumer fraud litigation: Part 2 | Intellectual property | United States

  • Order:
  • Duration: 58:42
  • Updated: 02 Nov 2016
  • views: 82
videos
S P E A K E R S Jeffrey Margulies, Partner, Norton Rose Fulbright Michelle Pardo, Partner, Norton Rose Fulbright Saul Perloff, Partner, Norton Rose Fulbright Stephanie Stroup, Senior Counsel, Norton Rose Fulbright Companies that make, market and sell consumer products are increasingly vulnerable to consumer fraud litigation. Class actions alleging deceptive advertising and unfair trade practices have become a veritable "growth industry" for enterprising plaintiff's lawyers. These cases often flow directly from government investigations and enforcement actions or private business litigation. For consumer product companies, understanding the current trends influencing consumer fraud litigation is crucial to managing this risk. Our two part webinar will discuss the key considerations and trends impacting consumer fraud litigation today, including government and Lanham Act litigation, recent legal decisions, as well as class action litigation and trial strategies. Topics included: - Current developments in class certification and lessons learned at trial S E L F - S T U D Y If you are viewing a recording of this web seminar, most state bar organizations will only allow you to claim self-study CLE credit. Please refer to your state's CLE rules. If you have any questions regarding CLE approval of this course in your applicable bar, please contact your bar administrator.
https://wn.com/Advertising_And_Consumer_Fraud_Litigation_Part_2_|_Intellectual_Property_|_United_States
US District Court of RI Litigation Academy HD

US District Court of RI Litigation Academy HD

  • Order:
  • Duration: 5:01
  • Updated: 02 Sep 2016
  • views: 470
videos
The “Litigation Academy” is a program of the United States District Court for the District of Rhode Island in partnership with Roger Williams University Law School and the Rhode Island Chapter of the Federal Bar Association that was created to provide a low-cost, high-quality forum for teaching practitioners of all experience levels the skills needed to successfully litigate cases. You are welcome to watch a short video of the program that was created by Carlos Andres Toro of Steer Digital Media.
https://wn.com/US_District_Court_Of_Ri_Litigation_Academy_Hd
Life sciences securities litigation and enforcement issues | Healthcare | United States

Life sciences securities litigation and enforcement issues | Healthcare | United States

  • Order:
  • Duration: 58:57
  • Updated: 19 May 2016
  • views: 129
videos
S P E A K E R S Robin Adelstein, Partner, Norton Rose Fulbright Kevin Harnisch, Partner, Norton Rose Fulbright Peter Stokes, Partner, Norton Rose Fulbright P R E S E N T A T I O N - http://ow.ly/nk8m300neGR B L O G - http://www.thehealthlawpulse.com/ Pharmaceutical, medical device and biotech companies are facing increasing scrutiny from the United States (US) Securities & Exchange Commission (SEC) and Department of Justice (DOJ), and have become a target for securities class action lawyers. Last year, life sciences companies accounted for nearly one third of all US securities class actions filed. Given the increased focus on internal controls, it is more important than ever for these companies to understand the litigation and enforcement ramifications of their disclosure practices. Please join us for a discussion regarding the impact of the current securities litigation and enforcement environment on life sciences companies. Topics will include: - the recent speech by the SEC's Chief Accountant regarding enforcement priorities in the life sciences industry - the SEC's heightened focus on internal controls and financial reporting issues - the types of claims securities class action plaintiffs are asserting against life sciences companies - the current state of the law regarding the scope of a company's duty to disclose unfavorable information - the steps companies can take to improve their disclosure practices and minimize their securities litigation and enforcement risk - other new class action litigation risks, including classwide liability for unsolicited faxes to pharmacies S E L F - S T U D Y If you are viewing a recording of this web seminar, most state bar organizations will only allow you to claim self-study CLE credit. Please refer to your state's CLE rules. If you have any questions regarding CLE approval of this course in your applicable bar, please contact your bar administrator.
https://wn.com/Life_Sciences_Securities_Litigation_And_Enforcement_Issues_|_Healthcare_|_United_States
Grant Thornton ERISA Litigation

Grant Thornton ERISA Litigation

  • Order:
  • Duration: 33:20
  • Updated: 06 Nov 2016
  • views: 38
videos https://wn.com/Grant_Thornton_Erisa_Litigation
Litigation!!(Satire)

Litigation!!(Satire)

  • Order:
  • Duration: 9:50
  • Updated: 06 Jun 2011
  • views: 21
videos
A story about litigation in American society.
https://wn.com/Litigation_(Satire)