• United States v. Microsoft: Deposition by Bill Gates, part 1.

    United States v. Microsoft was a court case filed against Microsoft by the United States Department of Justice. The plaintiffs alleged that Microsoft abused monopoly power in its handling of operating system sales and web browser sales. The issue central to the case was whether Microsoft was allowed to bundle its flagship Internet Explorer (IE) web browser software with its Windows operating system. Microsoft stated that the merging of Windows and Internet Explorer was the result of innovation and competition, and that the two were now the same product and were inextricably linked together and that consumers were now getting all the benefits of IE for free.

    published: 03 May 2012
  • Litigation Attorney, What Constitutes Someone Being Called A United States Natural Born Citizen

    See also https://publiushuldah.wordpress.com/category/natural-born-citizen/ I use the ff. to guide Founding Fathers Intent: "To be a United States Natural Born Citizen, he (or she) must be one of sole nationality, so that were he (or she) ever stripped of citizenship in the United States, he (or she) would be declared as “Stateless. " "...the term ‘natural born citizen’ is used and excludes all persons owing allegiance by birth to foreign states.” The New Englander and Yale Law Review, Volume 3 (1845), p. 414 In 1833, in U.S. Supreme Court Justice Joseph Story's Commentaries on the Constitution of the United States. § 1473 “ It is indispensible too, that the president should be a natural born citizen of the United States... to exclude foreign influence from their executive coun...

    published: 12 Feb 2016
  • United States v.s Holy Land Foundation Litigation #JihadInAmerica

    The Holy Land Foundation was the largest Islamic charity in the United States. Headquartered in Richardson, Texas, it was originally known as Occupied Land Fund. In December 2001, the U.S. government designated HLF a terrorist organization, seized its assets, and closed the organization. In 2004, a federal grand jury in Dallas, Texas charged HLF and five former officers and employees with providing material support to Hamas and related offenses. The prosecution's theory was that HLF distributed charity through local zakat (charity) committees located in the West Bank; that Hamas controlled those zakat committees; and that by distributing charity through Hamas-controlled committees, HLF helped Hamas win the "hearts and minds" of the Palestinian people. The first trial, in 2007, ended in th...

    published: 23 Jun 2016
  • Jeffrey L. Fisher | Supreme Court Litigation

    Professor Jeffrey L. Fisher - one of the most experienced and successful appellate advocates in the country - discusses his practice before the United States Supreme Court. Fisher leads Stanford's Supreme Court clinic. In an interview with Professor Lisa Kern Griffin, he addresses the cert. process and the Supreme Court's case selection, the role of oral argument, and some of his recent cases concerning marriage equality, digital privacy, and other criminal procedure issues. Sponsored by the Program in Public Law.

    published: 09 Feb 2016
  • US District Court of RI Litigation Academy HD

    The “Litigation Academy” is a program of the United States District Court for the District of Rhode Island in partnership with Roger Williams University Law School and the Rhode Island Chapter of the Federal Bar Association that was created to provide a low-cost, high-quality forum for teaching practitioners of all experience levels the skills needed to successfully litigate cases. You are welcome to watch a short video of the program that was created by Carlos Andres Toro of Steer Digital Media.

    published: 02 Sep 2016
  • What is INTERNATIONAL LITIGATION? What does INTERNATIONAL LITIGATION mean?

    What is INTERNATIONAL LITIGATION? What does INTERNATIONAL LITIGATION mean? INTERNATIONAL LITIGATION meaning - INTERNATIONAL LITIGATION definition - INTERNATIONAL LITIGATION explanation. Source: Wikipedia.org article, adapted under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/ license. SUBSCRIBE to our Google Earth flights channel - https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC6UuCPh7GrXznZi0Hz2YQnQ International litigation, sometimes called transnational litigation, is the practice of litigation in connection with disputes among businesses or individuals residing or based in different countries. The main difference between international litigation and domestic litigation is that, in the former, certain issues are more likely to be of significance — such as personal jurisdiction, service of proc...

    published: 21 Aug 2017
  • United States Body Shop Litigation (CNN Report)

    United States Body Shop Litigation (CNN Report)

    published: 17 Aug 2015
  • The Emerging World of Third-Party Litigation Financing in the United States

    John Beisner, a partner at Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, discusses the paper "Selling Lawsuits, Buying Trouble: The Emerging World of Third-Party Litigation Financing in the United States," which was released at the 10th Annual Legal Reform Summit on October 28, 2009. This paper begins with an overview of third-party litigation financing. It next examines current third-party financing practices in the United States. It then sets forth a critique of the practice, particularly the incentives it creates to engage in frivolous and abusive litigation. In this section, the paper also presents a case study on the Commonwealth of Australia, the first jurisdiction to permit third-party litigation funding, where such funding has dramatically increased litigation and given investors pe...

    published: 11 Apr 2011
  • What is an appeal in a civil litigation?

    What is an appeal in a civil litigation? This video introduces appellate practice, where a party that did not prevail on one or more claims in a civil litigation argues that the trial court judge committed an error. To discuss further, feel free to send me an email and to comment below. Also, please visit my new website and blog. I offer online tutoring and consultations. website: http://www.uslawessentials.squarespace.com blog: http://www.uslawessentials.squarespace.com/blog email:uslawessentials at gmail dot com Twitter:https://twitter.com/uslawessentials United States Law: An Introduction for International Students is available at: https://www.amazon.com/author/danieledelson

    published: 16 Aug 2014
  • United States of Monsanto: GMO giant is now litigation proof

    After President Obama signed the Agriculture Appropriations Bill into law on Tuesday, hundreds of thousands of people have voiced their opposition to H.R. 933. A provision in the law known as the "Monsanto Protection Act" protects the biotech industry from being sued in a court of law. The Farmer Assurance provision takes the Federal Court's right to halt the sale and use of genetically modified seed crops regardless of health risks. Jeffrey M. Smith, author of Seeds of Deception, joins us to discuss. Find RT America in your area: http://rt.com/where-to-watch/ Or watch us online: http://rt.com/on-air/rt-america-air/ Like us on Facebook http://www.facebook.com/RTAmerica Follow us on Twitter http://twitter.com/RT_America

    published: 29 Mar 2013
  • The Anatomy of a U.S. Litigation (Overview)

    Introduction to the 8-part series: "The Anatomy of a U.S. Litigation"

    published: 04 Nov 2013
  • Advertising and consumer fraud litigation: Part 1 | Intellectual property | United States

    S P E A K E R S Jeffrey Margulies, Partner, Norton Rose Fulbright Michelle Pardo, Partner, Norton Rose Fulbright Saul Perloff, Partner, Norton Rose Fulbright Stephanie Stroup, Senior Counsel, Norton Rose Fulbright Companies that make, market and sell consumer products are increasingly vulnerable to consumer fraud litigation. Class actions alleging deceptive advertising and unfair trade practices have become a veritable "growth industry" for enterprising plaintiff's lawyers. These cases often flow directly from government investigations and enforcement actions or private business litigation. For consumer product companies, understanding the current trends influencing consumer fraud litigation is crucial to managing this risk. Our two part webinar will discuss the key considerations and t...

    published: 07 Oct 2016
  • E. Duncan Getchell, Jr. - Healthcare Litigation: U.S. States v. U.S. Government

    America's health care future lies in the balance, and Virginia's Solicitor General E. Duncan Getchell, Jr., is one of the key figures in the legislative battle surrounding "Obamacare." The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act is the subject of numerous lawsuits; Getchell was instrumental in the Commonwealth of VA v. Sebelius case, where the State of Virginia claimed the new health care bill infringed on states' rights. Getchell speaks of the current litigation between the 28 states, including Virginia, and the U.S. Government.

    published: 27 Mar 2012
  • Frank Easterbrook, "The Supreme Court of the United States and Business Litigation"

    published: 20 Feb 2015
  • Day 1 Session 4: Debate - Litigation Development in the US and Canada in 2015

    Chair: David McCraw, NYTLynn Oberlander, First Look MediaDavid Schulz, Yale University ● Esha Bhandari, ACLUPaul Schabas, Blakes Law Firm ● David Post, ex-Temple University

    published: 06 Jul 2016
  • How This Investment Firm Hopes to Revolutionize Litigation in America

    Oct. 30, 2014 (Mimesis Law) -- Ralph Sutton, Chief Investment Officer at Bentham IMF, talks with Lee Pacchia about the business of funding small to medium-sized plaintiffs in commercial and patent litigation around the world. After launching in Australia 13 years ago, the firm has grown quickly and expanded to Europe and the United States. Sutton sees the United States as a particularly attractive market in part because litigation costs have risen so much over the last couple of decades that most plaintiffs are simply priced out of the American judicial system. "The world has shifted so radically to make the expense of litigation so overwhelming that the system really doesn't work for most of the country," he says. Not everyone shares his point of view. Sutton notes that the US Chamber of ...

    published: 30 Oct 2014
  • Papantonio: The US Chamber's Litigation Machine - The Ring Of Fire

    For years the US Chamber of Commerce has been releasing phony reports warning Americans that frivolous, junk lawsuits are clogging our court systems, causing prices of insurance, consumer goods, and everything else under the sun to rise. But while they were working to keep you out of the courts, they were filing dozens of lawsuits on behalf of their corporate cronies -- in fact, in 2009 they averaged one lawsuit filing every 3 days. Mike Papantonio talks about why the Chamber secretly loves litigation with Linda Lipsen, the CEO of the American Association for Justice.

    published: 03 Feb 2011
  • Advertising and consumer fraud litigation: Part 2 | Intellectual property | United States

    S P E A K E R S Jeffrey Margulies, Partner, Norton Rose Fulbright Michelle Pardo, Partner, Norton Rose Fulbright Saul Perloff, Partner, Norton Rose Fulbright Stephanie Stroup, Senior Counsel, Norton Rose Fulbright Companies that make, market and sell consumer products are increasingly vulnerable to consumer fraud litigation. Class actions alleging deceptive advertising and unfair trade practices have become a veritable "growth industry" for enterprising plaintiff's lawyers. These cases often flow directly from government investigations and enforcement actions or private business litigation. For consumer product companies, understanding the current trends influencing consumer fraud litigation is crucial to managing this risk. Our two part webinar will discuss the key considerations and t...

    published: 02 Nov 2016
  • Life sciences securities litigation and enforcement issues | Healthcare | United States

    S P E A K E R S Robin Adelstein, Partner, Norton Rose Fulbright Kevin Harnisch, Partner, Norton Rose Fulbright Peter Stokes, Partner, Norton Rose Fulbright P R E S E N T A T I O N - http://ow.ly/nk8m300neGR B L O G - http://www.thehealthlawpulse.com/ Pharmaceutical, medical device and biotech companies are facing increasing scrutiny from the United States (US) Securities & Exchange Commission (SEC) and Department of Justice (DOJ), and have become a target for securities class action lawyers. Last year, life sciences companies accounted for nearly one third of all US securities class actions filed. Given the increased focus on internal controls, it is more important than ever for these companies to understand the litigation and enforcement ramifications of their disclosure practices. Pl...

    published: 19 May 2016
  • UVA Law's Supreme Court Litigation Clinic Preps for Henderson v. U.S.

    Professor Daniel Ortiz, director of the Supreme Court Litigation Clinic at the University of Virginia School of Law, explains the clinic's work and its latest case, Henderson v. United States, which he will argue Feb. 24. Ortiz is the Michael J. and Jane R. Horvitz Distinguished Professor of Law.

    published: 20 Feb 2015
  • Andy Ostrowski: American System of Justice Litigation -- Overview

    published: 02 Sep 2017
  • Why Can't I File a Lawsuit in Federal Court?

    Join attorney Peter J. Lamont as he explains when a case can be filed in federal court. He explains the two requirements for filing in federal court and provides related facts concerning federal court lawsuits.

    published: 05 Apr 2013
  • Attorney John Bogart on Business Litigation the Advantages of Filing in State or Federal Courts

    Legal Discussions: With Salt Lake City Attorney, John Bogart. Mr. Bogart discusses the difference in filing in the State or Federal Courts when considering business litigation. Call him today to discuss your civil litigation issues with IP litigation, Securities Litigation and Business Litigation at 888-895-9517 or visit him at www.telosvglaw.com.

    published: 27 Jun 2013
  • How to remove a State court case to Federal court

    http://www.vondranlegal.com One question that pops up from time to time is the concept of FEDERAL COURT REMOVAL JURISDICTION. The federal courts are not empowered to hear just any old case. There must be both personal jurisdiction and subject matter jurisdiction. One of the legal issues that can arise in a lawsuit filed in the State Courts (for example a California Homeowner Bill of RIghts case) is that the Defendant (loan servicer, foreclosure trustee, securitized loan trustee etc.) wants to remove the case to federal court. When this happens, the following process is triggered: 1. Plaintiff files the state court lawsuit 2. Defendant seeks to remove the case to federal court (usually because they feel they will get a better outcome here for one reason or another) 3. A notice of ...

    published: 05 Jan 2015
United States v. Microsoft: Deposition by Bill Gates, part 1.

United States v. Microsoft: Deposition by Bill Gates, part 1.

  • Order:
  • Duration: 53:18
  • Updated: 03 May 2012
  • views: 119315
videos
United States v. Microsoft was a court case filed against Microsoft by the United States Department of Justice. The plaintiffs alleged that Microsoft abused monopoly power in its handling of operating system sales and web browser sales. The issue central to the case was whether Microsoft was allowed to bundle its flagship Internet Explorer (IE) web browser software with its Windows operating system. Microsoft stated that the merging of Windows and Internet Explorer was the result of innovation and competition, and that the two were now the same product and were inextricably linked together and that consumers were now getting all the benefits of IE for free.
https://wn.com/United_States_V._Microsoft_Deposition_By_Bill_Gates,_Part_1.
Litigation Attorney, What Constitutes Someone Being Called A United States Natural Born Citizen

Litigation Attorney, What Constitutes Someone Being Called A United States Natural Born Citizen

  • Order:
  • Duration: 12:09
  • Updated: 12 Feb 2016
  • views: 60658
videos
See also https://publiushuldah.wordpress.com/category/natural-born-citizen/ I use the ff. to guide Founding Fathers Intent: "To be a United States Natural Born Citizen, he (or she) must be one of sole nationality, so that were he (or she) ever stripped of citizenship in the United States, he (or she) would be declared as “Stateless. " "...the term ‘natural born citizen’ is used and excludes all persons owing allegiance by birth to foreign states.” The New Englander and Yale Law Review, Volume 3 (1845), p. 414 In 1833, in U.S. Supreme Court Justice Joseph Story's Commentaries on the Constitution of the United States. § 1473 “ It is indispensible too, that the president should be a natural born citizen of the United States... to exclude foreign influence from their executive councils and duties." Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. (1 Cranch) 137 (1803) @174 It cannot be presumed that any clause in the Constitution is intended to be without effect....
https://wn.com/Litigation_Attorney,_What_Constitutes_Someone_Being_Called_A_United_States_Natural_Born_Citizen
United States v.s  Holy Land Foundation Litigation #JihadInAmerica

United States v.s Holy Land Foundation Litigation #JihadInAmerica

  • Order:
  • Duration: 6:06
  • Updated: 23 Jun 2016
  • views: 153
videos
The Holy Land Foundation was the largest Islamic charity in the United States. Headquartered in Richardson, Texas, it was originally known as Occupied Land Fund. In December 2001, the U.S. government designated HLF a terrorist organization, seized its assets, and closed the organization. In 2004, a federal grand jury in Dallas, Texas charged HLF and five former officers and employees with providing material support to Hamas and related offenses. The prosecution's theory was that HLF distributed charity through local zakat (charity) committees located in the West Bank; that Hamas controlled those zakat committees; and that by distributing charity through Hamas-controlled committees, HLF helped Hamas win the "hearts and minds" of the Palestinian people. The first trial, in 2007, ended in the partial acquittal of one defendant and a hung jury on all other charges. At a retrial in 2008, the jury found all defendants guilty on all counts. The 2008 trial of the charity leaders was the "largest terrorism financing prosecution in American history." In 2009, the founders of the organization were given sentences of between 15 and 65 years in prison for "funneling $12 million to Hamas." The organization's website stated: "Our mission is to find and implement practical solutions for human suffering through humanitarian programs that impact the lives of the disadvantaged, disinherited, and displaced peoples suffering from man-made and natural disasters." HLF, originally known as the Occupied Land Fund, was established in California in 1989 as a tax-exempt charity. In 1992, HLF relocated to Richardson, Texas. It had offices in California, New Jersey, and Illinois, and individual representatives scattered throughout the US, the West Bank, and Gaza. Among the founders of the Holy Land Foundation is Mousa Mohammed Abu Marzook, a political leader of Hamas, who provided substantial funds to the Holy Land Foundation in the early 1990s, before Hamas was designated a terrorist organization. HLF reported Marzook's donations on its tax returns. Marzook was deported from the US to Jordan in 1997. He was indicted on August 20, 2004, by a US federal grand jury in Chicago, Illinois. He and two other individuals were charged with a 15-year conspiracy to raise funds for terrorist attacks against Israel. Neither HLF nor any HLF officer was charged in the Chicago indictment. In the year 2000, HLF raised over $13 million. According to the United States Department of Treasury, HLF supported Hamas activities through direct fund transfers to its offices in the West Bank and Gaza that are affiliated with Hamas, and transfers of funds to Islamic charity committees ("zakat committees") and other charitable organizations that are part of Hamas or controlled by Hamas members. The Department of Treasury also reported that HLF funds were used by Hamas to support schools that served Hamas's ends by encouraging children to become suicide bombers and to recruit suicide bombers by offering support to their families. Edward Abington, Jr., former U.S. consul general in Jerusalem, acted as a defense witness and testified that during his daily CIA briefings he had never been informed that Hamas controlled the Palestinian charity groups mentioned. The Treasury Department designated HLF as a terrorist organization on December 4, 2001 under President Bush's Executive Order 13224 (Bush). The United States Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Asset Control designated HLF as a Specially Designated Global Terrorist, while the European Union froze its European Assets. -~-~~-~~~-~~-~- Please watch: "EXPOSING: Roman Curia (Catholic Church) And Global Pedophila Networks" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mxGgRSRDuRM -~-~~-~~~-~~-~-
https://wn.com/United_States_V.S_Holy_Land_Foundation_Litigation_Jihadinamerica
Jeffrey L. Fisher | Supreme Court Litigation

Jeffrey L. Fisher | Supreme Court Litigation

  • Order:
  • Duration: 1:13:17
  • Updated: 09 Feb 2016
  • views: 727
videos
Professor Jeffrey L. Fisher - one of the most experienced and successful appellate advocates in the country - discusses his practice before the United States Supreme Court. Fisher leads Stanford's Supreme Court clinic. In an interview with Professor Lisa Kern Griffin, he addresses the cert. process and the Supreme Court's case selection, the role of oral argument, and some of his recent cases concerning marriage equality, digital privacy, and other criminal procedure issues. Sponsored by the Program in Public Law.
https://wn.com/Jeffrey_L._Fisher_|_Supreme_Court_Litigation
US District Court of RI Litigation Academy HD

US District Court of RI Litigation Academy HD

  • Order:
  • Duration: 5:01
  • Updated: 02 Sep 2016
  • views: 419
videos
The “Litigation Academy” is a program of the United States District Court for the District of Rhode Island in partnership with Roger Williams University Law School and the Rhode Island Chapter of the Federal Bar Association that was created to provide a low-cost, high-quality forum for teaching practitioners of all experience levels the skills needed to successfully litigate cases. You are welcome to watch a short video of the program that was created by Carlos Andres Toro of Steer Digital Media.
https://wn.com/US_District_Court_Of_Ri_Litigation_Academy_Hd
What is INTERNATIONAL LITIGATION? What does INTERNATIONAL LITIGATION mean?

What is INTERNATIONAL LITIGATION? What does INTERNATIONAL LITIGATION mean?

  • Order:
  • Duration: 7:40
  • Updated: 21 Aug 2017
  • views: 13
videos
What is INTERNATIONAL LITIGATION? What does INTERNATIONAL LITIGATION mean? INTERNATIONAL LITIGATION meaning - INTERNATIONAL LITIGATION definition - INTERNATIONAL LITIGATION explanation. Source: Wikipedia.org article, adapted under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/ license. SUBSCRIBE to our Google Earth flights channel - https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC6UuCPh7GrXznZi0Hz2YQnQ International litigation, sometimes called transnational litigation, is the practice of litigation in connection with disputes among businesses or individuals residing or based in different countries. The main difference between international litigation and domestic litigation is that, in the former, certain issues are more likely to be of significance — such as personal jurisdiction, service of process, evidence from abroad, and enforcement of judgments. Although there are differences among the jurisdictional statutes of many American states, they all are subject to the due process requirements imposed by the Constitution of the United States. As a result, most American lawyers who are familiar with general principles of jurisdiction in one or more states of the US are able to guide their clients through jurisdictional issues in connection with disputes among litigants from different states. The situation is different with respect to jurisdictional principles in the international context. The first difference concerns long-arm jurisdiction, which is the statutory grant of jurisdiction to local courts over out-of-state defendants. A long-arm statute authorizes a court in a state to exercise jurisdiction over an out-of-state defendant. Without a long-arm statute, the courts in a state might not have personal jurisdiction over an out-of-state defendant. A state's authorization to exercise jurisdiction is limited by the federal Constitution. The use of a long-arm statute is usually considered constitutional where the defendant has certain minimum contacts with the forum state and there has been reasonable notice of the action against that defendant. Second, many countries take the view that American concepts of long-arm jurisdiction are too broad, and courts of such countries will not recognize judgments from American courts based on the exercise of American long-arm jurisdiction. Looking at the issue from the non-American perspective, courts in some countries exercise jurisdiction based upon principles that American courts would consider unfair and repugnant to American law. For example, in some countries, such as England and Israel, a court may exercise jurisdiction over a defendant that is considered to be a "necessary or proper" party in a case against a local defendant. It is not clear that such a jurisdictional basis would be upheld by American courts when the non-US judgment-creditor seeks to enforce in the United States. In every lawsuit, the plaintiff must effect service of process upon the defendant(s). In the international context, the issue of service of process is more complex. In the United States, service of process is routinely carried out by private lawyers or their agents. In contrast, many other countries consider the activity of serving process in a judicial proceeding to be one appropriate only for the government or an arm of the government. As a result of differing approaches to the issue of service of process, several nations signed the Hague Service Convention (1965), under which each member nation is required to establish a Central Authority to receive, review, and execute requests from foreign courts for carrying out service of process. Most countries that are signatories to the Hague Service Convention will accept requests for service that are signed by the lawyer for the plaintiff (claimant). Two exceptions are the UK and Israel. .....
https://wn.com/What_Is_International_Litigation_What_Does_International_Litigation_Mean
United States Body Shop Litigation (CNN Report)

United States Body Shop Litigation (CNN Report)

  • Order:
  • Duration: 10:55
  • Updated: 17 Aug 2015
  • views: 29
videos https://wn.com/United_States_Body_Shop_Litigation_(Cnn_Report)
The Emerging World of Third-Party Litigation Financing in the United States

The Emerging World of Third-Party Litigation Financing in the United States

  • Order:
  • Duration: 2:06
  • Updated: 11 Apr 2011
  • views: 737
videos
John Beisner, a partner at Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, discusses the paper "Selling Lawsuits, Buying Trouble: The Emerging World of Third-Party Litigation Financing in the United States," which was released at the 10th Annual Legal Reform Summit on October 28, 2009. This paper begins with an overview of third-party litigation financing. It next examines current third-party financing practices in the United States. It then sets forth a critique of the practice, particularly the incentives it creates to engage in frivolous and abusive litigation. In this section, the paper also presents a case study on the Commonwealth of Australia, the first jurisdiction to permit third-party litigation funding, where such funding has dramatically increased litigation and given investors pervasive — even total — control over a plaintiff's litigation. Finally, the paper proposes that third-party litigation financing be prohibited in the United States to prevent these abuses. At the very least, the paper concludes, such funding should be banned in class actions and other forms of aggregate litigation. The paper can be found online here: http://www.instituteforlegalreform.com/selling-lawsuits-buying-trouble-the-emerging-world-of-third-party-litigation-financing-in-the-united-states.html
https://wn.com/The_Emerging_World_Of_Third_Party_Litigation_Financing_In_The_United_States
What is an appeal in a civil litigation?

What is an appeal in a civil litigation?

  • Order:
  • Duration: 2:15
  • Updated: 16 Aug 2014
  • views: 3179
videos
What is an appeal in a civil litigation? This video introduces appellate practice, where a party that did not prevail on one or more claims in a civil litigation argues that the trial court judge committed an error. To discuss further, feel free to send me an email and to comment below. Also, please visit my new website and blog. I offer online tutoring and consultations. website: http://www.uslawessentials.squarespace.com blog: http://www.uslawessentials.squarespace.com/blog email:uslawessentials at gmail dot com Twitter:https://twitter.com/uslawessentials United States Law: An Introduction for International Students is available at: https://www.amazon.com/author/danieledelson
https://wn.com/What_Is_An_Appeal_In_A_Civil_Litigation
United States of Monsanto: GMO giant is now litigation proof

United States of Monsanto: GMO giant is now litigation proof

  • Order:
  • Duration: 7:25
  • Updated: 29 Mar 2013
  • views: 20376
videos
After President Obama signed the Agriculture Appropriations Bill into law on Tuesday, hundreds of thousands of people have voiced their opposition to H.R. 933. A provision in the law known as the "Monsanto Protection Act" protects the biotech industry from being sued in a court of law. The Farmer Assurance provision takes the Federal Court's right to halt the sale and use of genetically modified seed crops regardless of health risks. Jeffrey M. Smith, author of Seeds of Deception, joins us to discuss. Find RT America in your area: http://rt.com/where-to-watch/ Or watch us online: http://rt.com/on-air/rt-america-air/ Like us on Facebook http://www.facebook.com/RTAmerica Follow us on Twitter http://twitter.com/RT_America
https://wn.com/United_States_Of_Monsanto_Gmo_Giant_Is_Now_Litigation_Proof
The Anatomy of a U.S. Litigation (Overview)

The Anatomy of a U.S. Litigation (Overview)

  • Order:
  • Duration: 4:17
  • Updated: 04 Nov 2013
  • views: 61
videos
Introduction to the 8-part series: "The Anatomy of a U.S. Litigation"
https://wn.com/The_Anatomy_Of_A_U.S._Litigation_(Overview)
Advertising and consumer fraud litigation: Part 1 | Intellectual property | United States

Advertising and consumer fraud litigation: Part 1 | Intellectual property | United States

  • Order:
  • Duration: 57:38
  • Updated: 07 Oct 2016
  • views: 63
videos
S P E A K E R S Jeffrey Margulies, Partner, Norton Rose Fulbright Michelle Pardo, Partner, Norton Rose Fulbright Saul Perloff, Partner, Norton Rose Fulbright Stephanie Stroup, Senior Counsel, Norton Rose Fulbright Companies that make, market and sell consumer products are increasingly vulnerable to consumer fraud litigation. Class actions alleging deceptive advertising and unfair trade practices have become a veritable "growth industry" for enterprising plaintiff's lawyers. These cases often flow directly from government investigations and enforcement actions or private business litigation. For consumer product companies, understanding the current trends influencing consumer fraud litigation is crucial to managing this risk. Our two part webinar will discuss the key considerations and trends impacting consumer fraud litigation today, including government and Lanham Act litigation, recent legal decisions, as well as class action litigation and trial strategies. Topics included: - Government litigation priorities and Lanham litigation and recent trends in consumer class actions S E L F - S T U D Y If you are viewing a recording of this web seminar, most state bar organizations will only allow you to claim self-study CLE credit. Please refer to your state's CLE rules. If you have any questions regarding CLE approval of this course in your applicable bar, please contact your bar administrator.
https://wn.com/Advertising_And_Consumer_Fraud_Litigation_Part_1_|_Intellectual_Property_|_United_States
E. Duncan Getchell, Jr. - Healthcare Litigation: U.S. States v. U.S. Government

E. Duncan Getchell, Jr. - Healthcare Litigation: U.S. States v. U.S. Government

  • Order:
  • Duration: 1:12:50
  • Updated: 27 Mar 2012
  • views: 229
videos
America's health care future lies in the balance, and Virginia's Solicitor General E. Duncan Getchell, Jr., is one of the key figures in the legislative battle surrounding "Obamacare." The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act is the subject of numerous lawsuits; Getchell was instrumental in the Commonwealth of VA v. Sebelius case, where the State of Virginia claimed the new health care bill infringed on states' rights. Getchell speaks of the current litigation between the 28 states, including Virginia, and the U.S. Government.
https://wn.com/E._Duncan_Getchell,_Jr._Healthcare_Litigation_U.S._States_V._U.S._Government
Frank Easterbrook, "The Supreme Court of the United States and Business Litigation"

Frank Easterbrook, "The Supreme Court of the United States and Business Litigation"

  • Order:
  • Duration: 45:57
  • Updated: 20 Feb 2015
  • views: 505
videos
https://wn.com/Frank_Easterbrook,_The_Supreme_Court_Of_The_United_States_And_Business_Litigation
Day 1 Session 4: Debate - Litigation Development in the US and Canada in 2015

Day 1 Session 4: Debate - Litigation Development in the US and Canada in 2015

  • Order:
  • Duration: 1:21:59
  • Updated: 06 Jul 2016
  • views: 53
videos
Chair: David McCraw, NYTLynn Oberlander, First Look MediaDavid Schulz, Yale University ● Esha Bhandari, ACLUPaul Schabas, Blakes Law Firm ● David Post, ex-Temple University
https://wn.com/Day_1_Session_4_Debate_Litigation_Development_In_The_US_And_Canada_In_2015
How This Investment Firm Hopes to Revolutionize Litigation in America

How This Investment Firm Hopes to Revolutionize Litigation in America

  • Order:
  • Duration: 9:12
  • Updated: 30 Oct 2014
  • views: 862
videos
Oct. 30, 2014 (Mimesis Law) -- Ralph Sutton, Chief Investment Officer at Bentham IMF, talks with Lee Pacchia about the business of funding small to medium-sized plaintiffs in commercial and patent litigation around the world. After launching in Australia 13 years ago, the firm has grown quickly and expanded to Europe and the United States. Sutton sees the United States as a particularly attractive market in part because litigation costs have risen so much over the last couple of decades that most plaintiffs are simply priced out of the American judicial system. "The world has shifted so radically to make the expense of litigation so overwhelming that the system really doesn't work for most of the country," he says. Not everyone shares his point of view. Sutton notes that the US Chamber of Commerce and affiliated corporations stand as major challenges to the growth of the litigation funding industry. "They are introducing amendments to rules and potentially even legislation to limit the growth of the industry," he says. "You would hope that the US Chamber of Commerce would see that small and medium-sized businesses are part of their constituency and they don't seem to do that, unfortunately."
https://wn.com/How_This_Investment_Firm_Hopes_To_Revolutionize_Litigation_In_America
Papantonio: The US Chamber's Litigation Machine - The Ring Of Fire

Papantonio: The US Chamber's Litigation Machine - The Ring Of Fire

  • Order:
  • Duration: 8:18
  • Updated: 03 Feb 2011
  • views: 388
videos
For years the US Chamber of Commerce has been releasing phony reports warning Americans that frivolous, junk lawsuits are clogging our court systems, causing prices of insurance, consumer goods, and everything else under the sun to rise. But while they were working to keep you out of the courts, they were filing dozens of lawsuits on behalf of their corporate cronies -- in fact, in 2009 they averaged one lawsuit filing every 3 days. Mike Papantonio talks about why the Chamber secretly loves litigation with Linda Lipsen, the CEO of the American Association for Justice.
https://wn.com/Papantonio_The_US_Chamber's_Litigation_Machine_The_Ring_Of_Fire
Advertising and consumer fraud litigation: Part 2 | Intellectual property | United States

Advertising and consumer fraud litigation: Part 2 | Intellectual property | United States

  • Order:
  • Duration: 58:42
  • Updated: 02 Nov 2016
  • views: 69
videos
S P E A K E R S Jeffrey Margulies, Partner, Norton Rose Fulbright Michelle Pardo, Partner, Norton Rose Fulbright Saul Perloff, Partner, Norton Rose Fulbright Stephanie Stroup, Senior Counsel, Norton Rose Fulbright Companies that make, market and sell consumer products are increasingly vulnerable to consumer fraud litigation. Class actions alleging deceptive advertising and unfair trade practices have become a veritable "growth industry" for enterprising plaintiff's lawyers. These cases often flow directly from government investigations and enforcement actions or private business litigation. For consumer product companies, understanding the current trends influencing consumer fraud litigation is crucial to managing this risk. Our two part webinar will discuss the key considerations and trends impacting consumer fraud litigation today, including government and Lanham Act litigation, recent legal decisions, as well as class action litigation and trial strategies. Topics included: - Current developments in class certification and lessons learned at trial S E L F - S T U D Y If you are viewing a recording of this web seminar, most state bar organizations will only allow you to claim self-study CLE credit. Please refer to your state's CLE rules. If you have any questions regarding CLE approval of this course in your applicable bar, please contact your bar administrator.
https://wn.com/Advertising_And_Consumer_Fraud_Litigation_Part_2_|_Intellectual_Property_|_United_States
Life sciences securities litigation and enforcement issues | Healthcare | United States

Life sciences securities litigation and enforcement issues | Healthcare | United States

  • Order:
  • Duration: 58:57
  • Updated: 19 May 2016
  • views: 113
videos
S P E A K E R S Robin Adelstein, Partner, Norton Rose Fulbright Kevin Harnisch, Partner, Norton Rose Fulbright Peter Stokes, Partner, Norton Rose Fulbright P R E S E N T A T I O N - http://ow.ly/nk8m300neGR B L O G - http://www.thehealthlawpulse.com/ Pharmaceutical, medical device and biotech companies are facing increasing scrutiny from the United States (US) Securities & Exchange Commission (SEC) and Department of Justice (DOJ), and have become a target for securities class action lawyers. Last year, life sciences companies accounted for nearly one third of all US securities class actions filed. Given the increased focus on internal controls, it is more important than ever for these companies to understand the litigation and enforcement ramifications of their disclosure practices. Please join us for a discussion regarding the impact of the current securities litigation and enforcement environment on life sciences companies. Topics will include: - the recent speech by the SEC's Chief Accountant regarding enforcement priorities in the life sciences industry - the SEC's heightened focus on internal controls and financial reporting issues - the types of claims securities class action plaintiffs are asserting against life sciences companies - the current state of the law regarding the scope of a company's duty to disclose unfavorable information - the steps companies can take to improve their disclosure practices and minimize their securities litigation and enforcement risk - other new class action litigation risks, including classwide liability for unsolicited faxes to pharmacies S E L F - S T U D Y If you are viewing a recording of this web seminar, most state bar organizations will only allow you to claim self-study CLE credit. Please refer to your state's CLE rules. If you have any questions regarding CLE approval of this course in your applicable bar, please contact your bar administrator.
https://wn.com/Life_Sciences_Securities_Litigation_And_Enforcement_Issues_|_Healthcare_|_United_States
UVA Law's Supreme Court Litigation Clinic Preps for Henderson v. U.S.

UVA Law's Supreme Court Litigation Clinic Preps for Henderson v. U.S.

  • Order:
  • Duration: 3:13
  • Updated: 20 Feb 2015
  • views: 616
videos
Professor Daniel Ortiz, director of the Supreme Court Litigation Clinic at the University of Virginia School of Law, explains the clinic's work and its latest case, Henderson v. United States, which he will argue Feb. 24. Ortiz is the Michael J. and Jane R. Horvitz Distinguished Professor of Law.
https://wn.com/Uva_Law's_Supreme_Court_Litigation_Clinic_Preps_For_Henderson_V._U.S.
Andy Ostrowski: American System of Justice Litigation -- Overview

Andy Ostrowski: American System of Justice Litigation -- Overview

  • Order:
  • Duration: 26:51
  • Updated: 02 Sep 2017
  • views: 77
videos
https://wn.com/Andy_Ostrowski_American_System_Of_Justice_Litigation_Overview
Why Can't I File a Lawsuit in Federal Court?

Why Can't I File a Lawsuit in Federal Court?

  • Order:
  • Duration: 3:47
  • Updated: 05 Apr 2013
  • views: 5888
videos
Join attorney Peter J. Lamont as he explains when a case can be filed in federal court. He explains the two requirements for filing in federal court and provides related facts concerning federal court lawsuits.
https://wn.com/Why_Can't_I_File_A_Lawsuit_In_Federal_Court
Attorney John Bogart on Business Litigation the Advantages of Filing in State or Federal Courts

Attorney John Bogart on Business Litigation the Advantages of Filing in State or Federal Courts

  • Order:
  • Duration: 11:16
  • Updated: 27 Jun 2013
  • views: 0
videos
Legal Discussions: With Salt Lake City Attorney, John Bogart. Mr. Bogart discusses the difference in filing in the State or Federal Courts when considering business litigation. Call him today to discuss your civil litigation issues with IP litigation, Securities Litigation and Business Litigation at 888-895-9517 or visit him at www.telosvglaw.com.
https://wn.com/Attorney_John_Bogart_On_Business_Litigation_The_Advantages_Of_Filing_In_State_Or_Federal_Courts
How to remove a State court case to Federal court

How to remove a State court case to Federal court

  • Order:
  • Duration: 10:19
  • Updated: 05 Jan 2015
  • views: 6864
videos
http://www.vondranlegal.com One question that pops up from time to time is the concept of FEDERAL COURT REMOVAL JURISDICTION. The federal courts are not empowered to hear just any old case. There must be both personal jurisdiction and subject matter jurisdiction. One of the legal issues that can arise in a lawsuit filed in the State Courts (for example a California Homeowner Bill of RIghts case) is that the Defendant (loan servicer, foreclosure trustee, securitized loan trustee etc.) wants to remove the case to federal court. When this happens, the following process is triggered: 1. Plaintiff files the state court lawsuit 2. Defendant seeks to remove the case to federal court (usually because they feel they will get a better outcome here for one reason or another) 3. A notice of Removal is filed with the state court (ex. a Superior Court case in Los Angeles, San Francisco, Orange COunty, etc.). The state court basically puts things on hold pending any "order for remand" that sends the case back to state court. 4. The removal notice must be filed within 30 days of the summons and complaint being served, and/or within 30 days of discovering that the case is removable (ex. when a motion to amend raises a federal question such as TILA, FDCPA, RESPA, FCRA, etc. or you have a "diversity case" with citizens of different states suing each other when the "amount in controversy "EXCEEDS" $75,000 (meaning you need to allege at least $75,001. 5. The notice of removal is filed with the Federal Court (and a copy of all pleadings, summons, proof of service, and any orders rendered in the state court) get filed with the Federal Court. 6. The Plaintiff (if they believe there is improvident removal or a violation of FRCP Rule 11) may file a "motion for remand" to try to send the case back to state court. 7. In such a case, the federal court judge will be asked to decide whether there is proper federal court jurisdiction. As this video points out, there are but TWO WAYS TO GET INTO FEDERAL COURT: a. There is a "federal question" raised in the complaint (ex. a federal rule, regulation at issue - for example a federal truth in lending cause of action for loan rescission is raised). In this event, all Defendants named in the lawsuit must consent and "join" in the removal. b. Diversity Jurisdiction exists - this means that where the Plaintiff is a California resident, (no other Defendant named in the complaint is a California resident), meaning the Defendants are all "citizens" of another state besides California. Removal motions can create hotly contested legal issues. If you need a law firm to represent you in a federal court, (business, real estate insurance, and intellectual property litigation) check us out by clicking on the link above).
https://wn.com/How_To_Remove_A_State_Court_Case_To_Federal_Court